0

Does Seeing More Mean Knowing More? Mono-Anchored Advantage Normalization for Multi-Source Visual Reasoning

A novel mono-anchored multi-source reasoning framework that uses dynamic anchors to quantify information gain and regulate modality interactions during reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards.

Year
2026
Venue
arXiv 2026
Stars
7
Authors
6
Hosting
Abstract onlyARXIV-DEFAULT

Cite

Notes

Only stored in your browser.

Attribution

Abstract & full text
arxiv.org/abs/2605.25437ARXIV-DEFAULT
TL;DR
Semantic Scholar
Attribution policy →

Topics

2

Abstract

Visual reasoning through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has achieved remarkable progress. However, when dealing with multi-source inputs, existing approaches tend to treat them as a mere accumulation of information, lacking explicit mechanisms to distinguish whether integrating additional sources yields information gain or introduces interference. Therefore, they struggle to effectively model dynamic interaction when integrating multiple sources, particularly when they differ significantly in physical properties and semantics, e.g., infrared and depth, leading to inferior performance to mono-source reasoning when a certain source holds the dominant signal. To address this issue, we propose MARS, a novel mono-anchored multi-source reasoning framework that models each visual modality as an independent information source. Specifically, by treating mono-source rewards as dynamic anchors, our method explicitly incorporates the information gain introduced by multi-source fusion into advantage normalization and adaptively emphasizes mutual promotion between sources while suppressing potential noise or conflicts during RLVR. From theoretical analysis, our method effectively quantifies information gain introduced by multi-source integration in gradient estimation, enabling consistent modality regulation. Empirical results also show impressive 3.2% and 4.9% performance gains on GRPO and DAPO across diverse datasets, confirming effectiveness of our method.

Authors

6